Niagara实现procedural浪花

『部分工程文件点我下载』
『知乎转载链接』
『有点相关的Unreal Circle演讲』

Summary

因为本文涉及到的内容比较广,关于Niagara最基础的一些部分比如怎么新建、怎样添加使用模块就不详细说明了,没用过的同学可以先看一下Epic官方文档的介绍:
Niagara核心概念

和贾越同学的系列教学直播:
https://www.bilibili.com/video/av73602807

本次工程效果:

为了实现海浪拍到岩石上激起千层浪的感觉,我们可以看到有几个表现上的关键点

  • 在岩石附近生成水花
  • 水花激起的时机和位置与海水的流动匹配
  • 出射速度受到海水运动和石头表面的撞击情况影响
  • 激起后水花的体积感

海面的模拟 – Gerstner Waves

游戏里模拟海水的途径是一门艰深的课题,本文就不多涉及了。这里为了制作需要,介绍一下相对直观实用的Gerstner Waves。

在流体动力学中,Gerstner Waves是周期表面重力波的欧拉方程方程的精确解。它计算机图形技术之前很久就出现了,用来描述不可压缩流体的表面波动。

单一Gerstner Wave材质应用在一个平面上的效果如图:

数学时间


我们可以看到每一个点不止有Z轴方向的运动,也有XY轴的运动。并且这不是一个简单的sin波而是带有‘浪尖’的波形,这些都是Gerstner Wave的重要特征。

因为篇幅原因这里就不具体说公式了,本节末尾提供了我做好的材质节点可以直接下载取用。详细算法可以参考:

Chapter 1. Effective Water Simulation from Physical Models

https://developer.download.nvidia.com/books/HTML/gpugems/gpugems_ch01.html

简单说来,定义一个波形的属性有:

[高度, 前进方向, 波长, 陡峭度]

我们定义相位φ

φ = 方向 ⋅ 位置 / 波长 + 频率 * 时间

其中

频率 = sqrt(重力 * 2π / 波长)

那么以

z轴偏移 =  高度 * sin(φ)

xy轴偏移 = 陡峭度 * 高度 * 方向 * cos(φ)

的形式去移动海面的顶点,顶点会沿着椭圆绕圈(左图),一系列的顶点组合在一起就会形成具有浪尖的波形。

引擎内实现

在引擎里的实现可以用HLSL写在Custom节点里,你也可以选择用节点连。执行效率上,节点连出来的公式和HLSL代码没有区别。

材质函数 MF_GerstnerWave

核心部分:

float3 d = float3(sin(DirectionInDegrees * 0.0174533), cos(DirectionInDegrees * 0.0174533), 0);  // 为了控制方便,输入并不是一个向量而是角度,这里转换一下

float w = 6.2831854 / L;

float theta = sqrt(6.2831854 * Gravity / L); // 由波长算出频率

float q = Stiffness / (Amplitude * w); // q是控制浪尖陡峭度的系数

float phase = dot((w * d).xy, WorldPosition.xy) – theta * Time; // 喂给cos和sin的相位

float3 offset = float3(q * Amplitude * d.xy * cos(phase), Amplitude * sin(phase)); // 照抄上面公式

这部分我放在了BlueprintUE.com里,点下面链接直接把节点复制粘贴到UE材质编辑器里就可以得到图上的节点:

https://blueprintue.com/blueprint/tt5p124n/

波形叠加

显然,一条波并不能说非常炫酷,Gerstner Wave的典型做法是把多条波叠加在一起。上面提到每条波可以控制的变量有:[高度, 前进方向, 波长, 陡峭度]

要合并多个波形,首先考虑的是波长,因为能组合的波长数量有限(8个已经很多了),我们无法完全参照真实世界的海洋数据,只能尽可能利用能付出的资源。由于波长相似的wave在叠加时看起来更有错综复杂的动态表现,我们可以在输入参数里首先给一个波长的中值LengthMedian,然后让不同wave的波长围绕这个中值变化。这样只要保留所有wave的波长与LenghMedian的比例,就可以通过改变LengthMedian来调整整个海洋的波浪大小:

在定义一组waves的结构FGerstnerWavesParameters中,美术可以在海洋的蓝图Actor上直接填写LengthMedian。

接下来,美术可以手动填写各个wave和LengthMedian的比例,也可以像我一样偷懒,填一个LengthMultiplierRange然后随机选取范围内的比例,在场景里拖动Seed直到随出一个好看的组合。

类似的方法同样适用于高度, 前进方向, 陡峭度。要注意的是,wave的高度和波长存在正相关关系,简单的做法是定义一个常数比例,让每个wave高度和和波长的比例保持一致。而在定义前进方向时会类似的给出一个DirectionRange定义前进方向的范围。

Niagara GPU粒子的生成

匹配水面位移

上面说了这么多,海面Shader内的位移数据其实并不能被外界直接读取,为了让Niagara能获取到海面的位移数据从而实现位置的同步,我们需要额外做一些工作:

方块:Niagara GPU particles

因为Gerstner Wave算法是确定性的,即给定同样的 [ 高度 | 前进方向 | 波长 | 陡峭度 ] 这样一组参数,不管在哪算出来的波形都是一样一样的。所以我们只要把与海面同样的参数传入Niagara System,就可以让Niagara粒子去‘追踪‘海面的粒子。(如上图)

传参

Normal难度:

上面说到,海面的波形是由好几个不同的Gerstner Wave组成,这里我用了8个,那么需要匹配海面的形状,其实在生成浪花时我们不用考虑所有8个waves,只考虑最大的一或两级wave,视觉上就很难看出不完全吻合的细节差别了。

Hard难度:

这一块可选阅读,可以跳过,对下面内容的理解没有影响。

可是如果我觉得这样做身体不适,非想传所有数据达到完美同步呢? 也不是没有办法。4个参数 x 8组 = 一共32个float变量,手动命名并且在蓝图里拉面条,再在Niagara模块上一个一个拖上去也不是不行.. 如果你想做得灵巧些,我发掘了一个输入数组的hack:

因为Niagara还在beta阶段,一些功能还在持续改进中,这个hack可能以后也不需要。我介绍一下的另一个原因是觉得对增加对Niagara的理解有所帮助。

开始我想把数据通过DrawToRenderTarget写到一张贴图上,让Niagara读,但因为操作太不友好并且不支持CPU粒子放弃了。后来发现Niagara里的Curve型变量是同时支持CPU和GPU的,读取也很方便。我在蓝图里把需要的变量写入到一个Curve asset里,Niagara内reimport更新就可以,很方便。

不过Curve key的格式是有讲究的,Niagara CPU sim在读curve时,直接就读对应位置的key value。但GPU sim上会首先把curve编码成一个1×128像素的Lookup table,然后再读对应位置的数据,这就导致如果key的time位置不是100%对到LUT的像素位置上,encode后会出现偏差,这个偏差在我们现在的应用中是无法容许的。

好在encode的逻辑非常直接,只是取第一个key和最后一个key的time看范围,normalize到[0.0, 1.0]之间:

所以要达到key和LUT的像素对齐,最简单的方式是让time = [0, 1, 2… 127],这样不需要额外操作,在GPU sim上读取即可。

最后一个key的time是127.0

这样我们就实现了可以在一个curve里记录128个float值。剩下要做的就是再BP里根据一定规则把8个wave的一系列参数编码,再从Niagara模块里通过相同规则解码。这里4个参数*8个wave,规则就是很简单的按照一定间隔记录了32个值。

按照一定间隔,在整数Time上记录了每一组parameters

在Niagara module中通过类似方式解压

定义GPU粒子的碰撞行为

Distance Field Collision

系统提供的collision模块非常健全,包括CPU trace碰撞,GPU depth / distance field碰撞等分支可以在下拉菜单中选择使用。我们这里使用GPU distance field碰撞,depth碰撞比较适合比较粗犷的效果,比如下雨下雪,稍微有点问题也看不出来,但如果水浪使用depth碰撞,岩石背面屏幕看不到的地方就会出错。

我们想有一些比较细腻的控制逻辑,比如这里水花撞到石头上,如果用默认的collision碰撞,反弹是朝着下图绿色的反射向量方向飞出去的,而流体撞到刚体的行为并不是这样完美的反弹,我们更想让它偏向下图紫色的角度。

下面三个gif分别展示不同反射角度的视觉:

反弹方向为绿色反射角
反弹方向为紫色切线角
反弹方向反射和切线之间的随机角度

定义这样的碰撞行为需要自己写模块,幸运的是这种逻辑都可以用Niagara的节点实现。引擎提供的Collision模块本身是一个宝藏,里面有各种碰撞的实现方式和模块编辑的best practice。在Collision – CollisionQueryAndResponse模块中我们探索一下可以发现:

点进去最底层的模块是:

即给出world position获得global distance field的数值和gradient,和材质里的DistanceToNearestSurface / DistanceFieldGradient结果是一样的,都是GPU内的query。

知道了这些,我们就可以很方便的自己写一个简单的collision判断:

并且在后面接上上面说到的反射角和切线角的逻辑–如果发现水浪粒子进行了第一次和岩石碰撞,那么就沿着我们想要的角度给一个初速度:

距离优化

同时因为有了distance field信息,可以在particle spawn时判断水浪粒子是否在岩石附近,如果不在就直接删除。

Smear

水花的材质想做好也是一项涉及很广的任务,我这里就是用了一个比较简单的云的贴图,稍微加工了下。值得一提的是通过particle的速度可以在材质里实现速度拉伸效果,对表达浪花飞溅的夸张形态非常有帮助:

Smear = 0
Smear =3
Smear = 15

实现方式也很简单,因为粒子sprite是朝向camera的,我们只要以local position和移动速度的点积缩放sprite即可:

12,205 thoughts on “Niagara实现procedural浪花

  1. GavinNeusy

    Pleasant surprise, the post delivered more than the headline promised, and a stop at solidtrustbond continued that pattern of under promising and over delivering, the rarest combination on the modern web where most content does the opposite by promising the world and delivering thin recycled summaries instead each time you click on something interesting.

    Reply
  2. TobiasStick

    Took me back a step or two on an assumption I had been making, and a stop at cliffbeck pushed that reconsideration further, writing that gently corrects the reader without being aggressive about it is a rare diplomatic skill and the team here clearly knows how to land critical points without turning readers off.

    Reply
  3. Lexicomo

    Held my interest from the opening line through to the closing thought, and a stop at growthmoveswithsignal did the same, content that earns sustained attention in an environment full of distractions is doing something right and this site is clearly doing several things right rather than just one or two which I really appreciate.

    Reply
  4. GaryCef

    Found the rhythm of the prose particularly enjoyable on this read through, and a look at unitybridgebond kept that musical quality going across the related pages, sentence rhythm is something most blog writers ignore but it makes a real difference in how content lands with the careful reader who cares.

    Reply
  5. Cesarsmivy

    Felt the post had been quietly polished rather than aggressively styled, and a look at smartgrowth confirmed the same understated polish, sites whose quality reveals itself slowly rather than announcing itself loudly are the kind I trust more deeply because the trust is not based on first impressions of marketing but actual substance.

    Reply
  6. RyanAcawl

    My usual pattern is to skim and bounce but this site has reset that pattern temporarily, and a stop at findyourstyle maintained the slower reading mode, content that changes how I read is content with structural influence and this site has clearly nudged my reading behaviour toward something better at least for the duration of these visits.

    Reply
  7. Codyphync

    A piece that handled a controversial angle without becoming heated, and a look at bondedcircle continued that calm engagement, content that can address contested topics without inflaming them is doing rare diplomatic work and this site has clearly developed the editorial maturity to handle sensitive material with the appropriate temperature of writing throughout.

    Reply
  8. Nicolasarido

    Really thankful for posts that respect a reader’s time, this one does, and a quick look at directionalmap was the same, no need to scroll through endless intros just to get to the actual content, that approach alone is enough reason to come back here regularly for the kind of writing offered.

    Reply
  9. BrandonDep

    Saving the link for sure, this one is a keeper, and a look at capitalheritage confirmed I should bookmark the entire site rather than just this page, the consistency across what I have seen so far suggests there is a lot more here worth coming back for soon when I have more time.

    Reply
  10. Vancemaw

    Glad to find a site whose links lead somewhere worth going rather than back to itself for SEO juice, and a stop at progressalignment kept that generous outbound feel, citing other peoples work with real respect rather than just for ranking signals is a sign of an honest operation worth supporting going forward.

    Reply
  11. Gilbertvah

    Useful information presented in a way that does not feel like a sales pitch, that is what I appreciated most, and a stop at brandlaunch was the same, no upsell and no fake urgency just steady content laid out properly for someone trying to actually learn from it rather than just be sold to.

    Reply
  12. SebastianFrodo

    Took a screenshot of one section to come back to later, and a stop at peaktrustbond prompted another saved tab, the urge to capture and revisit specific pieces of content is something I rarely feel but when I do it tells me the work is worth more than the average passing read for sure.

    Reply
  13. Jaredfrawl

    Thanks for taking the time to write this, it is clear that some thought went into how each point would land, and after I went through impactanchor I had a better grip on the topic, real value without the usual marketing noise people have to put up with online when searching for answers.

    Reply
  14. Clintoncearp

    Reading carefully here has reminded me what reading carefully feels like, and a look at longtermalliances extended that reminder, the experience of careful reading versus skimming is different in ways I had partially forgotten and this site has clearly refreshed my memory of what attention feels like when content rewards it consistently.

    Reply
  15. MauriceEmpoM

    My reading list is short and selective and this site is now on it, and a stop at clutchchunk confirmed the placement, the short list of sites I read deliberately rather than encounter accidentally is something I curate carefully and adding to it is a real act of trust which this site has earned today.

    Reply
  16. Gavincom

    Glad I gave this a chance instead of bouncing on the headline, and after steadfastlink I was certain I had made the right call, snap judgements based on titles miss a lot of good content and this is a reminder to slow down and check things out before scrolling past in a hurry.

    Reply
  17. JoeFlifs

    Glad I gave this fifteen minutes rather than the usual three minute skim, and a look at grandanchor earned the same investment, time spent on quality content is rarely wasted but the reverse is also true and learning which sites deserve which kind of attention is part of being a careful online reader.

    Reply
  18. ColbyArind

    A piece that did not lecture even when it had clear positions, and a look at dreamvision maintained the same teaching without preaching tone, finding the line between informing and lecturing is hard and most sites land on the wrong side of it but this one has clearly figured out how to inform without becoming preachy.

    Reply
  19. ThomasGrOff

    Worth recommending broadly to anyone who reads on the topic, and a look at actionguidesmovement only confirms that, the rare combination of accessibility and depth in this site makes it suitable for both newcomers and people who already know the area which is hard to pull off in any blog format today and rarely managed.

    Reply
  20. VincentNog

    Felt like the post had been edited rather than just drafted and published, and a stop at synergycapitalgroup suggested the same care across the site, the difference between edited and unedited content is enormous for the reader and this site has clearly invested in the editing pass that most blogs skip entirely which really does show up.

    Reply
  21. BertHoity

    A genuine pleasure to find a site that publishes at a sustainable cadence rather than chasing the daily content treadmill, and a look at claritybuildsvelocity confirmed the careful publication rhythm, sites that prioritise quality over frequency are rare and this one has clearly chosen the slower pace which I appreciate as a reader.

    Reply
  22. Irvingshild

    Probably the kind of site that should be more widely read than it appears to be, and a look at legacycapital reinforced that quiet wish, the gap between a sites quality and its apparent reach is sometimes large and that gap exists for this site in a way that makes me want to mention it more.

    Reply
  23. DennisCet

    Found something quietly useful here that I expect to return to, and a stop at anchortrust added more of the same, content with quiet utility ages well in a way that flashy hot takes do not and I have learned to weight quiet utility much higher when deciding what to bookmark for later use.

    Reply
  24. BartAxown

    Strong recommendation from me, anyone curious about the topic should make time for this, and a look at actionshapesdirection only sharpens that recommendation further, the kind of resource that holds up against careful scrutiny rather than crumbling at the first critical question is rare and worth pointing other people toward when the topic comes up.

    Reply
  25. Bradfordendop

    The conclusions felt earned rather than tacked on at the end like an afterthought, and a look at bluechipbonding kept that careful structure going, you can tell when a writer has thought about the shape of their post versus just letting it ramble out and hoping for the best at the end which most do.

    Reply
  26. ReneRat

    Reading this in pieces during a long afternoon and finding it consistently rewarding, and a stop at progressorchestrator fit naturally into the same fragmented reading pattern, sites whose posts can be read in segments without losing the thread are well suited to how I actually read these days and this one is built well.

    Reply
  27. AlbertJeoff

    Just want to say thank you for putting this together, posts like these make searching online actually worth it sometimes, and a quick look at synergybonded kept that going, useful and easy to read without any of the tricks that ruin most blog comment sections lately on the wider open web.

    Reply
  28. Bertramvog

    Liked the way the post handled the final paragraph, no neat bow but no abrupt cutoff either, and a stop at growthnavigator continued that thoughtful ending pattern, endings are hard and most blog writers either over engineer them or skip them entirely and this site has clearly figured out a sustainable middle approach.

    Reply
  29. Cainweick

    Glad the writer did not feel compelled to cover every possible angle of the topic, focus is a virtue, and a stop at progresssignal reflected the same disciplined scope, knowing what to leave out is half of what makes good writing good and this post has clearly been edited with that principle in mind.

    Reply
  30. JaxonUself

    Probably going to mention this site in a write up I am working on later this month, and a stop at focusdirector provided more material for that potential mention, content worth referencing in my own published work rather than just personal reading is content with the highest endorsement level and this site has earned that endorsement.

    Reply
  31. RonaldRouch

    Useful enough to recommend to several people I know who would appreciate it, and a stop at claritydrivenmotion added more material I will pass along too, the kind of writing that earns word of mouth is the kind that actually delivers on its promises which is what this site does without any drama or fanfare attached.

    Reply
  32. Stewartastet

    If I had to defend the time I spend reading independent blogs this site would feature in the defence, and a look at trustallianceworks reinforced that defensive utility, the ongoing case for non algorithmic reading is one I make to myself periodically and sites like this one provide the actual evidence that supports the case clearly.

    Reply
  33. AntonioRaria

    Felt like I was reading something written by someone who actually thinks about the topic rather than reciting it, and a look at actionsequence reinforced that impression, the difference between recited content and considered content is huge and this site clearly belongs to the latter category which I appreciate as a careful reader looking for substance.

    Reply
  34. Danpub

    Now placing this in the small category of sites whose updates I would actually want to know about, and a stop at echelonbond confirmed that placement, the difference between sites I want to follow and sites I just consume from is real and this one has crossed into the active follow category from the casual consumption side.

    Reply
  35. ClintonDourf

    Solid endorsement from me, the writing earns it, and a look at guardedbond continues to earn it across the broader site too, the kind of operation that maintains quality across many pages rather than just one viral post is a sign of serious commitment and that is what I see here clearly across what I read.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *